README

Harden request headers, login interface and passwords to increase backend security.

Installation

composer require jvmtech/neos-hardening

Active by default

• Remove Neos version info from request headers *
• Set min password strength requirements

Optional features

• Change the default login url "/neos" to something like "/neos-random-suffix" *:

  JvMTECH:
    NeosHardening:
      loginUri: 'neos-random-suffix'
  

• Replace the dynamic login url check with a custom RegEx (not needed if you just replace loginUri):

  JvMTECH:
    NeosHardening:
      loginUriRegex: '/^(neos)?($|\/)/'
  

• Limit login interface access to specified ip addresses:

  JvMTECH:
    NeosHardening:
    allowedIPs:
      IPv4:
        - '172.20.30.40'
        - '172.20.0.0/24'
      IPv6:
        - '2001:0db8:85a3:0000:0000:8a2e:0370:7334'
  

• Define password strength requirements, defaults:

  JvMTECH:
    NeosHardening:
      checkPasswordStrengthOnAddUser: true
      checkPasswordStrengthOnSetUserPassword: true
      passwordRequirements:
        minLength: 8
        upperAndLowerCase: true
        numbers: true
        specialChars: false
        maxConsecutiveLetters: 0 # disabled
        maxConsecutiveNumbers: 0 # disabled
  

• An example for secure passwords (should be your standard because you use a password manager, right? 😉):

  JvMTECH:
    NeosHardening:
      passwordRequirements:
        minLength: 16
        upperAndLowerCase: true
        numbers: true
        specialChars: true
        maxConsecutiveLetters: 3
        maxConsecutiveNumbers: 3
  
  # "djxAHQC0bzc_tjd9nmg" would fail
  # "djx@HQC0bzc_tjd9nmg" would work
  

• Disable user on too many failed login attempts:

  JvMTECH:
    NeosHardening:
      checkFailedLogins: true
      blockAfterFailedLogins: 5
  

• Prevent reuse of old passwords:

  JvMTECH:
    NeosHardening:
      checkPasswordHistory: true
      passwordHistoryLength: 10
  

*) Why hiding stuff?

Hiding the Neos version in the request headers and moving the login to an new url is nothing else than "security by obsurity".

Yes. But it's another layer to make it a little bit harder to get into your system. Therefore, it's a low-hanging fruit we should take.

by jvmtech.ch